emailproductivity

kitvssubstack

winnerkit

for: newsletter as a business — selling products, courses, and memberships with full ownership of the audience and pricing

skip if: writers who want a built-in discovery audience and don't mind giving up a revenue cut for it

substack's biggest asset is discovery — its recommendation network and app can bring you readers you didn't have to find yourself. kit's biggest asset is ownership — your list, your automations, your pricing, with no revenue share on what you sell. the right choice depends on whether you value discovery or control more.

substack and kit both let you build a paid newsletter, but they're optimized for different things — substack for being found, kit for being in control once you already have an audience.

what each one actually is

Kit (formerly ConvertKit) is an email marketing platform built specifically for creators — automations built around tags and sequences, native support for selling digital products and courses, and full ownership of your subscriber list and pricing with no revenue cut on sales.

Substack is a newsletter publishing platform with built-in monetization (paid subscriptions) and a discovery network — a dedicated app and recommendation system that can surface your newsletter to new readers without you doing any marketing yourself.

pricing, honestly

kit's free tier covers up to 10,000 subscribers, with paid plans scaling by list size afterward — a flat subscription cost, no cut of what you sell. substack is free to start writing and publishing, but takes a 10% cut of paid subscription revenue (plus stripe's processing fees) — there's no flat fee, but you give up a meaningful percentage of every dollar a paying subscriber sends you.

at scale, the math flips depending on how much you're making: a newsletter earning a lot from paid subscriptions will pay substack more in percentage terms than kit's flat subscription fee would cost.

what it's actually like to use them

substack's writing and publishing experience is clean and purpose-built — write a post, hit publish, decide if it's free or paywalled. the app and discovery feed give your work a chance at organic reach that's genuinely hard to replicate elsewhere.

kit's interface is more "marketing tool" than "publishing tool" — it's built around managing subscriber relationships over time: tags, sequences, automations triggered by purchases or behavior. if your business is more than "write posts, get paid to read them," kit's tooling reflects that complexity better.

who kit is for

  • creators selling courses, digital products, or memberships beyond just paywalled posts
  • anyone who wants full ownership of pricing and subscriber data with no revenue share
  • creators building structured onboarding or sales sequences tied to specific subscriber actions

who substack is for

  • writers who want a built-in audience-discovery mechanism and are starting from zero
  • newsletters where the business model is straightforwardly "pay to read this"
  • writers who value a polished, dedicated reading app experience for subscribers

when to avoid each

don't use substack if your business model involves selling things beyond paywalled posts — courses, cohort programs, physical products — its tooling isn't built for that and the 10% cut applies regardless.

don't use kit if you have zero existing audience and were counting on built-in discovery to find your first readers — kit assumes you're bringing an audience, not building one from nothing via the platform itself.

stuff their landing pages won't tell you

  • substack's 10% cut is on gross subscription revenue, not profit — it adds up faster than it sounds once you have meaningful paid subscriber counts
  • kit's automation builder has a real learning curve — it's powerful but not as immediately intuitive as substack's "just write and publish" simplicity
  • migrating a paid substack to another platform means subscribers must re-enter payment info — expect real subscriber drop-off during any migration
  • substack's discovery network works best for writing-first content; it's less effective if your newsletter is mostly links or curation rather than original essays
  • kit's free tier branding is minimal but the platform name does appear in default email footers unless customized

the call

kit for a newsletter that's really a business — selling products, running structured automations, and keeping full ownership and pricing control without giving up a revenue percentage.

substack for writers who want to start publishing today and lean on its discovery network to find readers, especially if you're starting with little to no existing audience and a straightforward paid-subscription model.

frequently asked

does substack take a cut of my revenue?
yes, substack takes 10% of paid subscription revenue, on top of stripe's payment processing fees. kit charges a flat subscription fee based on subscriber count and takes no cut of what you sell through it.
which has better automation tools?
kit, clearly. its automation builder is designed around sequences, tags, and triggers — think 'someone bought my course, enroll them in this onboarding sequence.' substack's automation is much more limited; it's built primarily for publishing and paywalling posts, not complex subscriber journeys.
can i actually get new readers through substack that i wouldn't get otherwise?
yes, this is substack's main differentiator — the substack app and recommendation network surface your newsletter to other substack readers with similar interests. it's real discovery that kit, mailchimp, and most other esps simply don't offer.
what if i want to sell a course or digital product, not just a paid newsletter?
kit is built for that — it has native support for selling digital products and courses directly, with automations tied to purchases. substack is fundamentally built around the paid-subscription-to-posts model and is a worse fit if your business model is broader than 'pay to read.'
is it easy to migrate between the two?
exporting your subscriber list works from both, but you'll lose substack's specific paid-subscription relationships and need subscribers to re-enter payment details on the new platform — there's real friction in migrating an active paid newsletter either direction.
which is better for a brand-new newsletter with zero audience?
substack's discovery network gives a genuine head start with zero existing audience, since the recommendation system surfaces you to relevant readers. kit requires you to already have or build an audience elsewhere and bring them in — better once you have traction, harder at literal zero.
what the community thinks

don't just take our word for it.

redditwhat reddit thinksunfiltered chaoshacker newswhat hn thinkspedantic but honestproduct huntlaunch reviewsnice ship btwyoutubevideo reviews10 min you won't get backalternativetoalternatives & votesthe og comparison sitetwitter / xlive opinionshot takes only

some links on this page are affiliate links. we earn a small commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. we don't change verdicts for affiliate money — see how this site makes money.

last updated: june 18, 2026

related